MEASUREMENT RESEARCH ASSOCIATES
TEST INSIGHTS

January 2009
Greetings!

Oral examinations have many facets that come together in the scoring process.  We've identified that different oral exam formats (standardized protocols vs. practice-based cases) can function differently. Here's a brief summary of some of those findings.

Ross Brown
Manager of Test Development and Analysis

Differences in Candidate Performance Across Oral Exam Formats

Oral exams may include practice-based cases from the candidate's practice, or standardized protocols, or both. Often the same candidates are rated by the same examiners on the same clinical skills, for both cases and protocols.

Because the skills are the same for practice-based cases and protocols, it may seem the same candidate abilities, such as correctly diagnosing or treating a patient, are being assessed in both measurement contexts. However, when candidate performance on common skills are analyzed separately and compared across cases and protocols, systematic differences in candidate performance and clinical skill difficulty become apparent. These differences in performance and difficulty are observed after the many-facet Rasch model has accounted for differences in the specific exam elements that individual candidates encountered. The table shows examples from two different examinations.  Generally, the same skill seems to be more difficult in the context of the practice-based cases.  However, this does not always occur, as shown in Exam 2, Skill 3.

Little is known about the causes of these observed differences. The differences may be due to some aspect of the cases or protocols differentially affecting candidate performance or rater severity. Alternately, the differences may be due to differences in the skills in the different contexts. That is to say, the ability to diagnose a patient within a standardized, hypothetical protocol varies somewhat from the ability to diagnose a patient in the real-world context of an actual patient case. We continue to investigate the implications of using standardized protocols or candidate practice-based cases in the oral examination process.


Comparison of Skill Difficulties from Two Oral Exams Between  Practice-based Cases and Standardized Protocols

Number

Difficulty for Protocols

Difficulty for Cases

Exam 1

 

 

Skill 1

4.53

4.84

Skill 2

4.82

5.10

 

 

 

Exam 2

 

 

Skill 1

4.51

4.87

Skill 2

5.19

5.20

Skill 3

5.29

5.01

            Higher scaled scores indicate greater difficulty

Measurement Research Associates, Inc.
505 North Lake Shore Dr., Suite 1304
Chicago, IL  60611
Phone: (312) 822-9648     Fax: (312) 822-9650



Rasch-Related Resources: Rasch Measurement YouTube Channel
Rasch Measurement Transactions & Rasch Measurement research papers - free An Introduction to the Rasch Model with Examples in R (eRm, etc.), Debelak, Strobl, Zeigenfuse Rasch Measurement Theory Analysis in R, Wind, Hua Applying the Rasch Model in Social Sciences Using R, Lamprianou Journal of Applied Measurement
Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch Rasch Models for Measurement, David Andrich Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson Best Test Design - free, Wright & Stone
Rating Scale Analysis - free, Wright & Masters
Virtual Standard Setting: Setting Cut Scores, Charalambos Kollias Diseño de Mejores Pruebas - free, Spanish Best Test Design A Course in Rasch Measurement Theory, Andrich, Marais Rasch Models in Health, Christensen, Kreiner, Mesba Multivariate and Mixture Distribution Rasch Models, von Davier, Carstensen
Rasch Books and Publications: Winsteps and Facets
Applying the Rasch Model (Winsteps, Facets) 4th Ed., Bond, Yan, Heene Advances in Rasch Analyses in the Human Sciences (Winsteps, Facets) 1st Ed., Boone, Staver Advances in Applications of Rasch Measurement in Science Education, X. Liu & W. J. Boone Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences (Winsteps) Boone, Staver, Yale Appliquer le modèle de Rasch: Défis et pistes de solution (Winsteps) E. Dionne, S. Béland
Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (Facets), Thomas Eckes Rasch Models for Solving Measurement Problems (Facets), George Engelhard, Jr. & Jue Wang Statistical Analyses for Language Testers (Facets), Rita Green Invariant Measurement with Raters and Rating Scales: Rasch Models for Rater-Mediated Assessments (Facets), George Engelhard, Jr. & Stefanie Wind Aplicação do Modelo de Rasch (Português), de Bond, Trevor G., Fox, Christine M
Exploring Rating Scale Functioning for Survey Research (R, Facets), Stefanie Wind Rasch Measurement: Applications, Khine Winsteps Tutorials - free
Facets Tutorials - free
Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (Facets) - free, J.M. Linacre Fairness, Justice and Language Assessment (Winsteps, Facets), McNamara, Knoch, Fan

To be emailed about new material on www.rasch.org
please enter your email address here:

I want to Subscribe: & click below
I want to Unsubscribe: & click below

Please set your SPAM filter to accept emails from Rasch.org

www.rasch.org welcomes your comments:
Please email inquiries about Rasch books to books \at/ rasch.org

Your email address (if you want us to reply):

 

FORUMRasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic

Coming Rasch-related Events
Oct. 6 - Nov. 3, 2023, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com
Oct. 12, 2023, Thursday 5 to 7 pm Colombian timeOn-line workshop: Deconstruyendo el concepto de validez y Discusiones sobre estimaciones de confiabilidad SICAPSI (J. Escobar, C.Pardo) www.colpsic.org.co
June 12 - 14, 2024, Wed.-Fri. 1st Scandinavian Applied Measurement Conference, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden http://www.hkr.se/samc2024
Aug. 9 - Sept. 6, 2024, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com