MEASUREMENT RESEARCH ASSOCIATES TEST INSIGHTSFebruary 2010
 Greetings,   Examiner consistency within his/her own rating pattern in an oral examination should be monitored.  This brief study explores whether an examiner's internal consistency is related to his/her severity.  Lidia MartinezManager, Test Development and Analysis
The Relationship between Examiner Severity and Consistency
Examiner severity is the convenient term for the tendency of an examiner to give lower ratings or higher ratings. This tendency towards severity or leniency is due to examiner expectations, characteristics, and standards. A severity measure for each examiner in the many-facet Rasch analysis is calculated using all of the ratings the examiner gave during the course of the examination.

Examiner consistency is measured by a mean-square fit statistic. This statistic is based on the ratio of observed error variance to expected error variance.  It's expected value is 1 (i.e., a ratio of 1:1). The mean square fit statistic for an examiner indicates his/her consistency or how well his/her pattern of ratings meet expectations given examiner severity and candidate ability (i.e., fit to the model). Neither too high nor too low fit statistics are desirable.

When the examiner's fit statistic is less than .5, it indicates over 50% less variance in his/her ratings than is expected. It is likely that the examiner tended to give many candidates the same rating, regardless of their ability. This type of examiner is not only too predictable, but he/she is not distinguishing differences among candidates. When the fit statistic is greater than 1.5, it indicates over 50% more variance in his/her ratings than is expected. It is likely that the examiner gave candidates unexpectedly high or low ratings compared to their overall ability.

The question is whether there is a correlation between measured examiner severity and examiner consistency (outfit mean square fit statistic). To study this question, random performance examinations were selected and the Pearson correlation between severity and consistency for the examiners was calculated.

The table below shows that there are low, non-significant correlations between examiner severity and consistency.  The table also shows that the vast majority of the examiners meet the criteria for consistency.  The low correlations between severity and consistency show that 1) most examiners are internally consistent in their rating of candidates; 2) that examiners, regardless of their measured severity, tend to be consistent in their rating of candidates; and 3) that severity does not predict consistency or vice-versa.  The low numbers of inconsistent examiners reflects good examiner training and an understanding of the rating process.

 Exam N of Examiners Correlation between Severity and Consistency Significance(ns = not significant) Number  (%) of inconsistent examiners Exam 1 44 .05 ns 0 Exam 2 24 -.14 ns 0 Exam 3 72 .00 ns 4 (5%) Exam 4 146 -.09 ns 4 (3%) Exam 5 81 -.06 ns 2 (2%)

 Measurement Research Associates, Inc. 505 North Lake Shore Dr., Suite 1304 Chicago, IL  60611 Phone: (312) 822-9648     Fax: (312) 822-9650 www.MeasurementResearch.com

Rasch-Related Resources: Rasch Measurement YouTube Channel
Rasch Measurement Transactions & Rasch Measurement research papers - free An Introduction to the Rasch Model with Examples in R (eRm, etc.), Debelak, Strobl, Zeigenfuse Rasch Measurement Theory Analysis in R, Wind, Hua Applying the Rasch Model in Social Sciences Using R, Lamprianou El modelo métrico de Rasch: Fundamentación, implementación e interpretación de la medida en ciencias sociales (Spanish Edition), Manuel González-Montesinos M.
Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch Rasch Models for Measurement, David Andrich Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson Best Test Design - free, Wright & Stone
Rating Scale Analysis - free, Wright & Masters
Virtual Standard Setting: Setting Cut Scores, Charalambos Kollias Diseño de Mejores Pruebas - free, Spanish Best Test Design A Course in Rasch Measurement Theory, Andrich, Marais Rasch Models in Health, Christensen, Kreiner, Mesba Multivariate and Mixture Distribution Rasch Models, von Davier, Carstensen
Rasch Books and Publications: Winsteps and Facets
Applying the Rasch Model (Winsteps, Facets) 4th Ed., Bond, Yan, Heene Advances in Rasch Analyses in the Human Sciences (Winsteps, Facets) 1st Ed., Boone, Staver Advances in Applications of Rasch Measurement in Science Education, X. Liu & W. J. Boone Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences (Winsteps) Boone, Staver, Yale Appliquer le modèle de Rasch: Défis et pistes de solution (Winsteps) E. Dionne, S. Béland
Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (Facets), Thomas Eckes Rasch Models for Solving Measurement Problems (Facets), George Engelhard, Jr. & Jue Wang Statistical Analyses for Language Testers (Facets), Rita Green Invariant Measurement with Raters and Rating Scales: Rasch Models for Rater-Mediated Assessments (Facets), George Engelhard, Jr. & Stefanie Wind Aplicação do Modelo de Rasch (Português), de Bond, Trevor G., Fox, Christine M
Exploring Rating Scale Functioning for Survey Research (R, Facets), Stefanie Wind Rasch Measurement: Applications, Khine Winsteps Tutorials - free
Facets Tutorials - free
Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (Facets) - free, J.M. Linacre Fairness, Justice and Language Assessment (Winsteps, Facets), McNamara, Knoch, Fan

 To be emailed about new material on www.rasch.orgplease enter your email address here: I want to Subscribe: & click below I want to Unsubscribe: & click below Please set your SPAM filter to accept emails from Rasch.org