November 2008
An oral certification examination is very complex and requires the interaction of examiners, candidates, cases, and tasks in the scoring process.  Examiners are primarily responsible for scoring, so the consistency with which they score is an important aspect of the validity and reliability of the examination.

Lidia Martinez
Manager, Computer Based Testing and Analysis

The Measurement of Examiner Consistency
The multi-facet analysis provides measures of the consistency with which examiners score candidates.  The outfit mean-square statistic, the one we find most useful, is based on the ratio of observed variance to expected variance.  This fit statistic has an expectation of 1.00, that is, examiners rated as expected, given their severity, the ability of the candidate, and the difficulty of the task.
Various criteria for acceptable values have been used.  For most medical oral examinations, we use the criteria of less than 0.5 or greater than 1.5.  A fit statistic of less than 0.5 indicates a non-discriminating or overly consistent examiner who tends to give the same rating to all candidates.  A fit statistic greater than 1.5 indicates an inconsistent examiner who gave some ratings that are higher than expected to some less able candidates, and/or some lower than expected ratings to some able candidates.
One of the reasons examiners can show up as misfitting is due to deviations from their pattern of ratings.  For example, if an examiner is relatively lenient, but gives several unsatisfactory ratings to relatively able candidates, the examiner is likely to show up with a large outfit statistic that reflects that examiner's inconsistency in rating.
On the other hand, if an examiner rarely deviates from a particular rating, he/she is likely to have a low fit statistic.  For example, if an examiner tends to give ratings of 3 (satisfactory) to 90% of the candidates scored, regardless of the candidates' abilities, this examiner is likely to show up with a outfit statistic less than 0.5.  Since it is unlikely that this examiner had only satisfactory or better candidates, it is highly probable that the examiner is not using the rating scale to distinguish between the less able and more able candidates.
Fortunately, relatively few examiners show up as misfits in the oral certification examinations we typically analyze.  The table shows the number of examiners for five different oral certification exams and the number and percent of examiners who misfit.  This suggests that examiners are familiar with the scoring process and able to distinguish among the medical skill and expertise of the candidates they score. Since examiners' ratings are critical to oral examination scoring, it is re-assuring to know that they do their jobs effectively.



N of Examiners

N  fit < 0.5

(Non Discriminating)

N  fit > 1.5 (Inconsistent)

Total % Misfit Examiners

Exam 1





Exam 2





Exam 3





Exam 4





Exam 5





Measurement Research Associates, Inc.
505 North Lake Shore Dr., Suite 1304
Chicago, IL  60611
Phone: (312) 822-9648     Fax: (312) 822-9650

Please help with Standard Dataset 4: Andrich Rating Scale Model

Rasch Publications
Rasch Measurement Transactions (free, online) Rasch Measurement research papers (free, online) Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch Applying the Rasch Model 3rd. Ed., Bond & Fox Best Test Design, Wright & Stone
Rating Scale Analysis, Wright & Masters Introduction to Rasch Measurement, E. Smith & R. Smith Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement, Thomas Eckes Invariant Measurement: Using Rasch Models in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, George Engelhard, Jr. Statistical Analyses for Language Testers, Rita Green
Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar Journal of Applied Measurement Rasch models for measurement, David Andrich Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, Boone, Stave, Yale
in Spanish: Análisis de Rasch para todos, Agustín Tristán Mediciones, Posicionamientos y Diagnósticos Competitivos, Juan Ramón Oreja Rodríguez

To be emailed about new material on
please enter your email address here:

I want to Subscribe: & click below
I want to Unsubscribe: & click below

Please set your SPAM filter to accept emails from welcomes your comments:
Please email inquiries about Rasch books to books \at/

Your email address (if you want us to reply):


FORUMRasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic

Coming Rasch-related Events
Sept. 15-16, 2017, Fri.-Sat. IOMC 2017: International Outcome Measurement Conference, Chicago,
Oct. 13 - Nov. 10, 2017, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps),
Oct. 25-27, 2017, Wed.-Fri. In-person workshop: Applying the Rasch Model hands-on introductory workshop, Melbourne, Australia (T. Bond, B&FSteps), Announcement
Jan. 5 - Feb. 2, 2018, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps),
Jan. 10-16, 2018, Wed.-Tues. In-person workshop: Advanced Course in Rasch Measurement Theory and the application of RUMM2030, Perth, Australia (D. Andrich), Announcement
Jan. 17-19, 2018, Wed.-Fri. Rasch Conference: Seventh International Conference on Probabilistic Models for Measurement, Matilda Bay Club, Perth, Australia, Website
April 13-17, 2018, Fri.-Tues. AERA, New York, NY,
May 25 - June 22, 2018, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps),
June 29 - July 27, 2018, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps),
Aug. 10 - Sept. 7, 2018, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets),
Oct. 12 - Nov. 9, 2018, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps),
The HTML to add "Coming Rasch-related Events" to your webpage is:
<script type="text/javascript" src=""></script>