MEASUREMENT RESEARCH ASSOCIATES
TEST INSIGHTS
November 2008
Greetings! 
 
An oral certification examination is very complex and requires the interaction of examiners, candidates, cases, and tasks in the scoring process.  Examiners are primarily responsible for scoring, so the consistency with which they score is an important aspect of the validity and reliability of the examination.

Lidia Martinez
Manager, Computer Based Testing and Analysis

The Measurement of Examiner Consistency
The multi-facet analysis provides measures of the consistency with which examiners score candidates.  The outfit mean-square statistic, the one we find most useful, is based on the ratio of observed variance to expected variance.  This fit statistic has an expectation of 1.00, that is, examiners rated as expected, given their severity, the ability of the candidate, and the difficulty of the task.
 
Various criteria for acceptable values have been used.  For most medical oral examinations, we use the criteria of less than 0.5 or greater than 1.5.  A fit statistic of less than 0.5 indicates a non-discriminating or overly consistent examiner who tends to give the same rating to all candidates.  A fit statistic greater than 1.5 indicates an inconsistent examiner who gave some ratings that are higher than expected to some less able candidates, and/or some lower than expected ratings to some able candidates.
 
One of the reasons examiners can show up as misfitting is due to deviations from their pattern of ratings.  For example, if an examiner is relatively lenient, but gives several unsatisfactory ratings to relatively able candidates, the examiner is likely to show up with a large outfit statistic that reflects that examiner's inconsistency in rating.
 
On the other hand, if an examiner rarely deviates from a particular rating, he/she is likely to have a low fit statistic.  For example, if an examiner tends to give ratings of 3 (satisfactory) to 90% of the candidates scored, regardless of the candidates' abilities, this examiner is likely to show up with a outfit statistic less than 0.5.  Since it is unlikely that this examiner had only satisfactory or better candidates, it is highly probable that the examiner is not using the rating scale to distinguish between the less able and more able candidates.
 
Fortunately, relatively few examiners show up as misfits in the oral certification examinations we typically analyze.  The table shows the number of examiners for five different oral certification exams and the number and percent of examiners who misfit.  This suggests that examiners are familiar with the scoring process and able to distinguish among the medical skill and expertise of the candidates they score. Since examiners' ratings are critical to oral examination scoring, it is re-assuring to know that they do their jobs effectively.

 

Exam

N of Examiners

N  fit < 0.5

(Non Discriminating)

N  fit > 1.5 (Inconsistent)

Total % Misfit Examiners

Exam 1

109

4

11

14%

Exam 2

159

10

5

9%

Exam 3

24

0

0

0%

Exam 4

33

2

4

18%

Exam 5

49

0

2

4%

Measurement Research Associates, Inc.
505 North Lake Shore Dr., Suite 1304
Chicago, IL  60611
Phone: (312) 822-9648     Fax: (312) 822-9650
 


Rasch-Related Resources: Rasch Measurement YouTube Channel
Rasch Measurement Transactions & Rasch Measurement research papers - free An Introduction to the Rasch Model with Examples in R (eRm, etc.), Debelak, Strobl, Zeigenfuse Rasch Measurement Theory Analysis in R, Wind, Hua Applying the Rasch Model in Social Sciences Using R, Lamprianou Journal of Applied Measurement
Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch Rasch Models for Measurement, David Andrich Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson Best Test Design - free, Wright & Stone
Rating Scale Analysis - free, Wright & Masters
Virtual Standard Setting: Setting Cut Scores, Charalambos Kollias Diseño de Mejores Pruebas - free, Spanish Best Test Design A Course in Rasch Measurement Theory, Andrich, Marais Rasch Models in Health, Christensen, Kreiner, Mesba Multivariate and Mixture Distribution Rasch Models, von Davier, Carstensen
Rasch Books and Publications: Winsteps and Facets
Applying the Rasch Model (Winsteps, Facets) 4th Ed., Bond, Yan, Heene Advances in Rasch Analyses in the Human Sciences (Winsteps, Facets) 1st Ed., Boone, Staver Advances in Applications of Rasch Measurement in Science Education, X. Liu & W. J. Boone Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences (Winsteps) Boone, Staver, Yale Appliquer le modèle de Rasch: Défis et pistes de solution (Winsteps) E. Dionne, S. Béland
Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (Facets), Thomas Eckes Rasch Models for Solving Measurement Problems (Facets), George Engelhard, Jr. & Jue Wang Statistical Analyses for Language Testers (Facets), Rita Green Invariant Measurement with Raters and Rating Scales: Rasch Models for Rater-Mediated Assessments (Facets), George Engelhard, Jr. & Stefanie Wind Aplicação do Modelo de Rasch (Português), de Bond, Trevor G., Fox, Christine M
Exploring Rating Scale Functioning for Survey Research (R, Facets), Stefanie Wind Rasch Measurement: Applications, Khine Winsteps Tutorials - free
Facets Tutorials - free
Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (Facets) - free, J.M. Linacre Fairness, Justice and Language Assessment (Winsteps, Facets), McNamara, Knoch, Fan

To be emailed about new material on www.rasch.org
please enter your email address here:

I want to Subscribe: & click below
I want to Unsubscribe: & click below

Please set your SPAM filter to accept emails from Rasch.org

www.rasch.org welcomes your comments:
Please email inquiries about Rasch books to books \at/ rasch.org

Your email address (if you want us to reply):

 

FORUMRasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic

Coming Rasch-related Events
Oct. 6 - Nov. 3, 2023, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com
Oct. 12, 2023, Thursday 5 to 7 pm Colombian timeOn-line workshop: Deconstruyendo el concepto de validez y Discusiones sobre estimaciones de confiabilidad SICAPSI (J. Escobar, C.Pardo) www.colpsic.org.co
June 12 - 14, 2024, Wed.-Fri. 1st Scandinavian Applied Measurement Conference, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden http://www.hkr.se/samc2024
Aug. 9 - Sept. 6, 2024, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com