Stout (1990) discusses a reading comprehension test in which there are several passages and a set of questions relating to each passage. Traditionalists, he asserts, would consider each passage a separate dimension. [Though a far stronger tradition counts correct responses to accumulate a reading ability score.] He then comments "The example, by displaying a test that should be psychometrically labelled as `unidimensional', illustrates our view that minor or idiosyncratic dimensions should be ignored in assessing test dimensionality from the applications viewpoint" (p. 302). This practical view of unidimensionality Stout labels "essential unidimensionality". But Stout's view coincides exactly with Rasch's: "In the first place we must admit that on the whole the [Rasch] model gives a satisfactory description of the [BPP-N] data. The deviations found should therefore not lead us to give up the model at once; we should rather look for technical explanations of them" (Rasch 1992, p.91).
Stout discovers that "essential dimensionality" leads to one unique ordinal scale for each latent variable (p. 311), which is given by the raw scores. He then remarks: "Indeed unless there are solid psychometric grounds for preferring one interval scale over the rest, the situation is one of a unique ordinal scale with the choice of a convenient interval scale left up to the practitioner to be decided on pragmatic grounds" (p. 313).
What intervals scale choices are available to the practitioner? Earlier, Stout quoted Lord and Novick, "A major problem of mental test theory is to determine a good interval scaling to impose when the supporting theory implies only ordinal properties (1968)" (p. 304).
Suppose that a unique rank ordering supports two different linearizations. These linearizations must maintain the rank order, but on their different equal-interval metrics. Rasch (p. 121) uses cubes as an example. Cubes can be rank-ordered in size by volume or by length of a side. These always yield the same rank order. Both volume and side-length are expressed as numbers on linear-appearing scales. Do both linearizations produce interval scales of cubeness? Is the choice of scale merely a pragmatic decision for the practitioner? The crux of the matter is the definition of the latent variable. Let us add a one-unit cube to another cube (in such a way as to maintain cubeness). On which "linear" scale will cube-size increment by 1? Clearly the volume scale, not the side-length scale. This was Norman Campbell's (1920) argument. Interval scaling requires a concatenation rule. The concatenation rule depends on the definition of the variable, e.g., "cubeness". Then there is only one linear scale, which is defined by the concatenation. When any linear scaling (which supports concatenation) has been constructed all other scalings are merely linear transformations. The Rasch model constructs linear scales from raw scores (RMT 3:2, p. 62). It also constructs scales that support concatenation (RMT 2:1 p. 16). So the practitioner's pragmatic choice of a good interval scale is reduced to selecting the local origin and unit size for that Rasch scale.
Stout's attempt to eliminate "extraneous requirements such as Rasch's specific objectivity" (p.304), has served to confirm that specific objectivity is fundamental to measurement. Stout's "essential unidimensionality" is seen to be equivalent to "reasonable fit to the Rasch model."
John Michael Linacre
Campbell N.R. (1920) Physics: the elements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lord F.M., Novick M.R. (1968) Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
Stout W.F. (1990) A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation. Psychometrika 55, 2, 293-325.
Rank-ordered raw scores imply the Rasch model.Wright B.D. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 1998, 12:2 p. 637-8.
Please help with Standard Dataset 4: Andrich Rating Scale Model
|Rasch Measurement Transactions (free, online)||Rasch Measurement research papers (free, online)||Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch||Applying the Rasch Model 3rd. Ed., Bond & Fox||Best Test Design, Wright & Stone|
|Rating Scale Analysis, Wright & Masters||Introduction to Rasch Measurement, E. Smith & R. Smith||Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement, Thomas Eckes||Invariant Measurement: Using Rasch Models in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, George Engelhard, Jr.||Statistical Analyses for Language Testers, Rita Green|
|Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar||Journal of Applied Measurement||Rasch models for measurement, David Andrich||Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson||Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, Boone, Stave, Yale|
|in Spanish:||Análisis de Rasch para todos, Agustín Tristán||Mediciones, Posicionamientos y Diagnósticos Competitivos, Juan Ramón Oreja Rodríguez|
|Forum||Rasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic|
Go to Top of Page
Go to index of all Rasch Measurement Transactions
AERA members: Join the Rasch Measurement SIG and receive the printed version of RMT
Some back issues of RMT are available as bound volumes
Subscribe to Journal of Applied Measurement
Go to Institute for Objective Measurement Home Page. The Rasch Measurement SIG (AERA) thanks the Institute for Objective Measurement for inviting the publication of Rasch Measurement Transactions on the Institute's website, www.rasch.org.
|Coming Rasch-related Events|
|June 30 - July 29, 2017, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|July 31 - Aug. 3, 2017, Mon.-Thurs.||Joint IMEKO TC1-TC7-TC13 Symposium 2017: Measurement Science challenges in Natural and Social Sciences, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, imeko-tc7-rio.org.br|
|Aug. 7-9, 2017, Mon-Wed.||In-person workshop and research coloquium: Effect size of family and school indexes in writing competence using TERCE data (C. Pardo, A. Atorressi, Winsteps), Bariloche Argentina. Carlos Pardo, Universidad Catòlica de Colombia|
|Aug. 7-9, 2017, Mon-Wed.||PROMS 2017: Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium, Sabah, Borneo, Malaysia, proms.promsociety.org/2017/|
|Aug. 10, 2017, Thurs.||In-person Winsteps Training Workshop (M. Linacre, Winsteps), Sydney, Australia. www.winsteps.com/sydneyws.htm|
|Aug. 11 - Sept. 8, 2017, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com|
|Aug. 18-21, 2017, Fri.-Mon.||IACAT 2017: International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing, Niigata, Japan, iacat.org|
|Sept. 15-16, 2017, Fri.-Sat.||IOMC 2017: International Outcome Measurement Conference, Chicago, jampress.org/iomc2017.htm|
|Oct. 13 - Nov. 10, 2017, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|Jan. 5 - Feb. 2, 2018, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|Jan. 10-16, 2018, Wed.-Tues.||In-person workshop: Advanced Course in Rasch Measurement Theory and the application of RUMM2030, Perth, Australia (D. Andrich), Announcement|
|Jan. 17-19, 2018, Wed.-Fri.||Rasch Conference: Seventh International Conference on Probabilistic Models for Measurement, Matilda Bay Club, Perth, Australia, Website|
|April 13-17, 2018, Fri.-Tues.||AERA, New York, NY, www.aera.net|
|May 25 - June 22, 2018, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 29 - July 27, 2018, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|Aug. 10 - Sept. 7, 2018, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com|
|Oct. 12 - Nov. 9, 2018, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|The HTML to add "Coming Rasch-related Events" to your webpage is:|
The URL of this page is www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt122p.htm