The US Department of Agriculture surveys thousands of people about their nutritional status. But what is one dimension to policy-makers is clearly two dimensions to consumers.
Policy-makers want to find out whether consumers are eating the right amount of the right things. Consumers think differently. We think (a) how much am I eating, and then (b) what am I eating?
There are 10 questions on the Healthy Eating Index (HEI). Six questions concern the five good foods we should eat and the variety of food we ingest. Four questions concern the four bad ingredients in food we should avoid. What happens? If you eat a lot, you get plenty of good stuff and plenty of bad. If you eat little, you cut down on the bad stuff, but also miss out on the good. This is perplexing for a simple-minded analysis.
When analyzed together, as the policy-makers would prefer, the 10 item test has a person separation of 1.6 (reliability of .7) -- we can barely distinguish the healthy eaters from the unhealthy. Even, worse, the items probing the 4 bad ingredients are negatively correlated with the 6 good items. The bad ingredients are not contributing to measuring healthy eating! There are two empirical dimensions fighting each other -- this is a practical problem in multidimensionality, not one of those figments of an overactive imagination.
Let's split the HEI into the 6 good items and the 4 bad, and analyze them separately. Now all correlations within tests are positive. Person separations are 2.15 (6 items) and 1.95 (4 items), giving reliabilities of .8 for each subtest. Each part measures better than the whole!
If policy-makers really want to learn about the nutritional status of the population, they will need to learn about it, and then attack it, on two fronts: quantity of food and quality of food. As long as they combine the two, their measures will give them little useful direction.
Benjamin D. Wright
Managing Multidimensionality. Wright B. D. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 1997, 11:1 p. 540.
Forum | Rasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic |
Go to Top of Page
Go to index of all Rasch Measurement Transactions
AERA members: Join the Rasch Measurement SIG and receive the printed version of RMT
Some back issues of RMT are available as bound volumes
Subscribe to Journal of Applied Measurement
Go to Institute for Objective Measurement Home Page. The Rasch Measurement SIG (AERA) thanks the Institute for Objective Measurement for inviting the publication of Rasch Measurement Transactions on the Institute's website, www.rasch.org.
Coming Rasch-related Events | |
---|---|
Oct. 4 - Nov. 8, 2024, Fri.-Fri. | On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com |
Jan. 17 - Feb. 21, 2025, Fri.-Fri. | On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com |
May 16 - June 20, 2025, Fri.-Fri. | On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com |
June 20 - July 18, 2025, Fri.-Fri. | On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com |
Oct. 3 - Nov. 7, 2025, Fri.-Fri. | On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com |
The URL of this page is www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt111b.htm
Website: www.rasch.org/rmt/contents.htm