How Interaction Denies Objectivity

Suppose the five Tables below show the average gains observed for the same numbers of Boys and Girls when taught from books X and Y. Each Table shows a different hypothetical situation.

Table 1: Book Y gains more
X 20 20 20
Y 40 40 40
Both books 30 30 30

Table 1 tells us that performance gain on book Y was better than on book X regardless of gender.

Table 2: Girls gain more
X 20 40 30
Y 20 40 30
Both books 20 40 30

Table 2 tells us that Girls gain more than Boys regardless of book used.

Table 3: Book Y and Girls gain more
X 20 40 30
Y 40 80 60
Both books 30 60  

In Table 3, even though Boys gain more than Girls and performance gain on book Y is better than on book X, each of these conclusions can still be drawn separately.

In Tables 1, 2 and 3, the gender conclusion does not depend on which book was used and the book conclusion does not depend on which gender. Data which allow the book conclusion to be gender-free and the gender conclusion to be book-free are data which enable objective inference about book and gender.

Now inspect Tables 4 and 5 in which there is an interaction between book and gender.

Table 4: Book Y and Girls gain more?
X 40 20 30
Y 40 80 60
Both books 40 50  

In Table 4, gain on book X is better for Boys while book Y is better for Girls. We might want to conclude from the "Both books" row and the "All" column that the performance gain on book Y was better for everyone and that Girls gained more on both books, but that would be a conclusion which these data do not support.

Table 5: Who gains more?
X40 20 30
Y 20 40 30
Both books 30 30  

In Table 5, book X is better for Boys and book Y is better for Girls, but there is no basis at all for concluding that performance gain on either book is better, or that either gender gains more. The presence of interaction in these data denies objective inferences about book and gender.

If we intend our research to lead to objective inference, i.e., to provide useful contributions to knowledge, then we must model, construct and organize our data so that interactions of the kinds shown in Tables 4 and 5 do not occur.

Objectivity and IRT Models

The "2" and "3" parameter IRT models (2-PL, 3-PL) introduce guessing and discrimination parameters which model interaction and thereby destroy the possibility of objective inference concerning person abilities or item difficulties.

It also follows that item response data which are allowed to manifest substantial variation in guessing and discrimination will not sustain objective inferences concerning persons or items.

Andrew Stephanou contributed to this version.

How interaction denies objectivity. Wright BD. … Rasch Measurement Transactions, 1988, 1:2 p.12

Rasch Publications
Rasch Measurement Transactions (free, online) Rasch Measurement research papers (free, online) Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch Applying the Rasch Model 3rd. Ed., Bond & Fox Best Test Design, Wright & Stone
Rating Scale Analysis, Wright & Masters Introduction to Rasch Measurement, E. Smith & R. Smith Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement, Thomas Eckes Invariant Measurement: Using Rasch Models in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, George Engelhard, Jr. Statistical Analyses for Language Testers, Rita Green
Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar Journal of Applied Measurement Rasch models for measurement, David Andrich Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, Boone, Stave, Yale
in Spanish: Análisis de Rasch para todos, Agustín Tristán Mediciones, Posicionamientos y Diagnósticos Competitivos, Juan Ramón Oreja Rodríguez

To be emailed about new material on
please enter your email address here:

I want to Subscribe: & click below
I want to Unsubscribe: & click below

Please set your SPAM filter to accept emails from welcomes your comments:

Your email address (if you want us to reply):


ForumRasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic

Go to Top of Page
Go to index of all Rasch Measurement Transactions
AERA members: Join the Rasch Measurement SIG and receive the printed version of RMT
Some back issues of RMT are available as bound volumes
Subscribe to Journal of Applied Measurement

Go to Institute for Objective Measurement Home Page. The Rasch Measurement SIG (AERA) thanks the Institute for Objective Measurement for inviting the publication of Rasch Measurement Transactions on the Institute's website,

Coming Rasch-related Events
June 26 - July 24, 2020, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps),
June 29 - July 1, 2020, Mon.-Wed. Measurement at the Crossroads 2020, Milan, Italy ,
July - November, 2020On-line course: An Introduction to Rasch Measurement Theory and RUMM2030Plus (Andrich & Marais),
July 1 - July 3, 2020, Wed.-Fri. International Measurement Confederation (IMEKO) Joint Symposium, Warsaw, Poland,
Aug. 7 - Sept. 4, 2020, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets),
Oct. 9 - Nov. 6, 2020, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps),
June 25 - July 23, 2021, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps),


The URL of this page is