T-Rasch is a computer program that evaluates the conformance of dichotomous data to the local independence axiom of the Rasch model. This analysis yields insights into what is meant by "fit" to the model.
An example data file, Example1.dat, is provided with the Demo version of T-Rasch. This is shown as a Guttman scalogram in the Table. Item 8 is the easiest item, item 2 the hardest. "+"s flag the item and person best-fitting (i.e., most Guttman-pattern-like)according to their INFIT and OUTFIT mean-squares computed by Winsteps. "?"s flag the worst fitting. It can be seen that persons in the bottom half of the scalogram (from person 7 down) challenge the item hierarchy.
Person Item | 8 9 6 310 1 4 5 7 2 | Fit ------------------------------- 15 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | 12 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 | 14 | 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 | 17 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 | 20 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 | 3 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 | 8 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 | 23 | 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 | + 24 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 | 26 | 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 | 9 | 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 | 25 | 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 | 1 | 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 | 4 | 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 | 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 | ? 13 | 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 | 28 | 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 | 22 | 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 | 2 | 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 | 10 | 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 | ? 11 | 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 | 16 | 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 | 27 | 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 | 30 | 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 | 5 | 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 | 6 | 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 | ? 18 | 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 | 19 | 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 | ? 29 | 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 | 21 | 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | ----------------------------- Fit:| + ? ? ? | | 8 9 6 310 1 4 5 7 2 | |
Since this scalogram is so small, we can quickly determine by eye some of the structural features in it. Items 8 and 9 pair up. Perhaps this is because they are both easier items, but perhaps they contradict the criterion of local independence. Items 3 and 1 pair up for person 18 (near the bottom), and also frequently as the eye follows them up the scalogram. Similarly for items 4 and 7 from person 6 up. In contrast, items 4 and 5 tend to be in opposition.
T-Rasch recommends the investigation of specific item pairs, but also implements a test of the general hypothesis that pairs of items exhibit local independence under the Rasch model. The graph presents the results. For each item pair, the x-coordinate is the correlation of the observation residuals (computed by Winsteps). The y-coordinate is the probability of observing more inconsistent data (i.e., data apparently more locally dependent) under Rasch model conditions. The trend line is drawn by eye.
The three item pairs identified by eye are the three item pairs reported as .000 by T-Rasch. These also have the highest inter-item residual correlations. .000 means that in simulating 1,000 data sets that with the same characteristics as the observed one, but under Rasch model conditions, none manifested less local independence than the observed data set for these pairs of items. Thus, these pairs of items fail this test of local independence.
Item pairs 4-9 and 3-6 exhibit empirical local independence, because their residual correlations are zero. If the data fit the Rasch model exactly, then all residual correlations would be statistically zero.
Item pair 4-5 is reported as being more consistent with the local Rasch model than 996 of 1000 simulated data sets. It is seen that the negative correlation of this pair is interpreted as indicating more local independence than even a zero correlation.
This is a thought-provoking reversal of a frequent misunderstanding in interpreting Rasch fit statistics. The usual temptation is to conceptualize misfit as occurring in only one direction, that is away from a perfect Guttman pattern. The more the departure, the worse the fit. This way of thinking overlooks that fact that some randomness is need in the data in order to construct a measurement system.
In the case of local independence, however, the fit interpretation is reversed. The closer the data comes to the perfect Guttman pattern the less local independence there is, and so the worse the fit. But this does not mean that the further from the Guttman pattern, the better, as item pair 4-5 demonstrates.
The moral of the story: Whenever a data set looks too good according to the fit criterion of the moment, the analyst needs to be especially alert to failure of the data to meet other, perhaps more crucial, criteria.
John Michael Linacre
Ponocny, I. & Ponocny-Seliger, E. (1999) T-Rasch program. Groningen, The Netherlands: ProGAMMA.
; Winsteps control and data file title="T-Rasch Data" prcomp=R ; raw residuals name1=2 ; start of person id namelength=2 ; length of person id item1=6 ; start of response string ni=10 ; number of items xwide=2 ; responses are 2 characters wide codes=" 1 0" ; valid response codes &end 8 ; original item number 9 6 3 10 1 4 5 7 2 END NAMES 15 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | 12 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 | 14 | 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 | 17 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 | 20 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 | 3 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 | 8 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 | 23 | 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 | + 24 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 | 26 | 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 | 9 | 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 | 25 | 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 | 1 | 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 | 4 | 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 | 7 | 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 | ? 13 | 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 | 28 | 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 | 22 | 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 | 2 | 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 | 10 | 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 | ? 11 | 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 | 16 | 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 | 27 | 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 | 30 | 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 | 5 | 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 | 6 | 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 | ? 18 | 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 | 19 | 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 | ? 29 | 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 | 21 | 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
Explorations into Local Independence with T-Rasch Ponocny, I., Ponocny-Seliger,E. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 1999, 13:3 p. 710
Rasch Publications | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Rasch Measurement Transactions (free, online) | Rasch Measurement research papers (free, online) | Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch | Applying the Rasch Model 3rd. Ed., Bond & Fox | Best Test Design, Wright & Stone |
Rating Scale Analysis, Wright & Masters | Introduction to Rasch Measurement, E. Smith & R. Smith | Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement, Thomas Eckes | Invariant Measurement: Using Rasch Models in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, George Engelhard, Jr. | Statistical Analyses for Language Testers, Rita Green |
Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar | Journal of Applied Measurement | Rasch models for measurement, David Andrich | Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson | Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, Boone, Stave, Yale |
in Spanish: | Análisis de Rasch para todos, Agustín Tristán | Mediciones, Posicionamientos y Diagnósticos Competitivos, Juan Ramón Oreja Rodríguez |
Forum | Rasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic |
Go to Top of Page
Go to index of all Rasch Measurement Transactions
AERA members: Join the Rasch Measurement SIG and receive the printed version of RMT
Some back issues of RMT are available as bound volumes
Subscribe to Journal of Applied Measurement
Go to Institute for Objective Measurement Home Page. The Rasch Measurement SIG (AERA) thanks the Institute for Objective Measurement for inviting the publication of Rasch Measurement Transactions on the Institute's website, www.rasch.org.
Coming Rasch-related Events | |
---|---|
June 23 - July 21, 2023, Fri.-Fri. | On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com |
Aug. 11 - Sept. 8, 2023, Fri.-Fri. | On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com |
The URL of this page is www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt133m.htm
Website: www.rasch.org/rmt/contents.htm