"Why do the average category measures sometimes say an obviously easy lower rating scale category is more difficult than a much harder higher category?"
This often perplexes us. First, a definition: "difficulty" is always a combination of "difficulty of observing" and "difficulty of doing". We hope that "difficulty of observing" is much less than "difficulty of doing" so that "doing" dominates the data.
For instance, imagine an observation protocol designed to assess speed. We can easily observe cars driving less than 50 km/hour: we can give them a rating of "1". It is more difficult to observe cars driving faster than 50 km/hour, because we have less time in which to observe each one: we can give them a rating of "3". It is almost impossible to observe cars driving exactly 50 km/hour, because they are rare, but we can give those cars (if we observe any) a rating of "2".
On the intended rating scale of "slow", "medium", "fast", the ratings are ordered 1,2,3. In difficulty of observing, however, the ratings are ordered 1,3,2. These two orderings will be confounded in our data set. Consequently we can expect that the step calibrations, the Rasch rating scale parameters, will be disordered.
If we note down all the cars observed in category 1, and then average their measures on our entire instrument, we obtain an average measure for category 1. This reports "what is the average measure of cars rated 1 in this sample?". Similarly, the average measure for category 2 reports on "what is the average measure of cars rated 2 in this sample?" These averages are measures on the underlying linear metric, but are descriptive of this sample and this use of the rating scale. Since observation of a higher category is supposed to be indicative of an object with more of the variable, we expect that the average measure for category 2 will be noticeably higher than that for category 1, and 3 higher than 2. If not, this use of the rating scale has produced a blurred or contradictory description of this sample, so that we have good reason to examine our measuring instrument for flaws. Do the items cooperate to form one variable? Do higher categories indicate more of the variable in a uniform way? Are raters using the instrument in the manner intended?
John Michael Linacre
Difficulties and Average Category Measures Shizuka T., Linacre J.M. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 2000, 13:4 p. 717
|Rasch Measurement Transactions (free, online)||Rasch Measurement research papers (free, online)||Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch||Applying the Rasch Model 3rd. Ed., Bond & Fox||Best Test Design, Wright & Stone|
|Rating Scale Analysis, Wright & Masters||Introduction to Rasch Measurement, E. Smith & R. Smith||Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement, Thomas Eckes||Invariant Measurement: Using Rasch Models in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, George Engelhard, Jr.||Statistical Analyses for Language Testers, Rita Green|
|Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar||Journal of Applied Measurement||Rasch models for measurement, David Andrich||Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson||Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, Boone, Stave, Yale|
|in Spanish:||Análisis de Rasch para todos, Agustín Tristán||Mediciones, Posicionamientos y Diagnósticos Competitivos, Juan Ramón Oreja Rodríguez|
|Forum||Rasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic|
Go to Top of Page
Go to index of all Rasch Measurement Transactions
AERA members: Join the Rasch Measurement SIG and receive the printed version of RMT
Some back issues of RMT are available as bound volumes
Subscribe to Journal of Applied Measurement
Go to Institute for Objective Measurement Home Page. The Rasch Measurement SIG (AERA) thanks the Institute for Objective Measurement for inviting the publication of Rasch Measurement Transactions on the Institute's website, www.rasch.org.
|Coming Rasch-related Events|
|June 29 - July 27, 2018, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|July 25 - July 27, 2018, Wed.-Fri.||Pacific-Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS), (Preconference workshops July 23-24, 2018) Fudan University, Shanghai, China "Applying Rasch Measurement in Language Assessment and across the Human Sciences", www.promsociety.org|
|July 29 - August 4, 2018||Vth International Summer School `Applied Psychometrics in Psychology and Education`, Institute of Education at the Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg, Russia, https://ioe.hse.ru/en/announcements/215681182.html|
|July 30 - Nov., 2018||Online Introduction to Classical and Rasch Measurement Theories (D.Andrich), University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia, http://www.education.uwa.edu.au/ppl/courses|
|Aug. 10 - Sept. 7, 2018, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com|
|August 25 - 28, 2018, Sat.-Tue.||Análisis de Rasch introductorio (en español). (Agustín Tristán), Instituto de Evaluación e Ingeniería Avanzada. San Luis Potosí, México. www.ieia.com.mx|
|Sept. 3 - 6, 2018, Mon.-Thurs.||IMEKO World Congress, Belfast, Northern Ireland, www.imeko2018.org|
|Oct. 12 - Nov. 9, 2018, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
The URL of this page is www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt134c.htm