It is important to distinguish between "comparisons" and "preferences". The person makes a comparison as to which of the pair of stimuli has more of the property, e.g., comparing cups of coffee as to which is sweeter. This comparison should essentially not be a function of the person's liking for sugar in coffee. A sweeter cup should, in general, taste sweeter to everyone (and, when we have relative similar amounts of sugar, we get proportions rather than perfection in the numbers deciding one way or the other.)
In the case of preferences, the person parameter ("ideal point" in the language of Clyde Coombs) plays a central role. Taking the sweetness of coffee example again, the person is asked which of each pair of cups of coffee the person prefers as to sweetness, not which is sweeter (irrespective of the person's preference). In this case, the person will prefer the cup of coffee which is closest to the person's ideal amount of sweetness relative to those cups that are both less and more sweet.
It is very important to distinguish the instructions that are given to people and to consider which model is the most appropriate (i.e., has the correct properties). It is convenient to use the word "comparison" when the person's location is not supposed to be involved, and the word "preference" when the person's location is supposed to be involved.
This is confused in the literature. For instance, there is Luce's so-called choice axiom (1959). This essentially states that, when there are several alternatives available, the probability of the preferred option is independent of the sequence of decisions. When this axiom is expressed algebraically, no person parameter is specified. But preferences are obviously decision-maker dependent. The same flaw is evident in the algebraic formulation of the Shepard-Luce choice rule, which can be expressed: "Choice probability increases with strength of evidence that an object belongs to a category." These have added further to the confusion of terminology, models and response processes.
David Andrich, email@example.com
Luce RD (1959) Individual Choice Behavior. New York: Wiley.
Shepard, Roger N. (1964), "On Subjectively Optimum Selection among Multi-Attribute Alternatives," in Human Judgments and Optimality, eds. M.W. Shelley and G. L. Bryan, N.Y.: John Wiley.
Comparisons vs. preferences. Andrich DA. 16:1 p.859
Comparisons vs. preferences. Andrich DA. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 2002, 16:1 p.859
|Rasch Measurement Transactions (free, online)||Rasch Measurement research papers (free, online)||Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch||Applying the Rasch Model 3rd. Ed., Bond & Fox||Best Test Design, Wright & Stone|
|Rating Scale Analysis, Wright & Masters||Introduction to Rasch Measurement, E. Smith & R. Smith||Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement, Thomas Eckes||Invariant Measurement: Using Rasch Models in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, George Engelhard, Jr.||Statistical Analyses for Language Testers, Rita Green|
|Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar||Journal of Applied Measurement||Rasch models for measurement, David Andrich||Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson||Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, Boone, Stave, Yale|
|in Spanish:||Análisis de Rasch para todos, Agustín Tristán||Mediciones, Posicionamientos y Diagnósticos Competitivos, Juan Ramón Oreja Rodríguez|
|Forum||Rasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic|
Go to Top of Page
Go to index of all Rasch Measurement Transactions
AERA members: Join the Rasch Measurement SIG and receive the printed version of RMT
Some back issues of RMT are available as bound volumes
Subscribe to Journal of Applied Measurement
Go to Institute for Objective Measurement Home Page. The Rasch Measurement SIG (AERA) thanks the Institute for Objective Measurement for inviting the publication of Rasch Measurement Transactions on the Institute's website, www.rasch.org.
|Coming Rasch-related Events|
|Apr. 14-17, 2020, Tue.-Fri.||International Objective Measurement Workshop (IOMW), University of California, Berkeley, https://www.iomw.org/|
|May 22 - June 19, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 26 - July 24, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 29 - July 1, 2020, Mon.-Wed.||Measurement at the Crossroads 2020, Milan, Italy , https://convegni.unicatt.it/mac-home|
|July - November, 2020||On-line course: An Introduction to Rasch Measurement Theory and RUMM2030Plus (Andrich & Marais), http://www.education.uwa.edu.au/ppl/courses|
|July 1 - July 3, 2020, Wed.-Fri.||International Measurement Confederation (IMEKO) Joint Symposium, Warsaw, Poland, http://www.imeko-warsaw-2020.org/|
|Aug. 7 - Sept. 4, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com|
|Oct. 9 - Nov. 6, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 25 - July 23, 2021, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
The URL of this page is www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt161d.htm