Question: I am doing non-equivalent-groups common-item equating of two tests using the Rasch model. My common items are 20 multiple-choice items (worth 1 point) and 1 partial credit (essay) item worth 4 points. How do I compute an equating constant?
Response: Let's assume a scatter-plot of the difficulties of the 21 items on the two tests indicates that their pattern approximates an identity line. (If it does not, you need to investigate whether the "common items" really are common.) You now need to compute a defensible equating constant.
Check if the structure of the partial credit item has changed between tests. The default "item difficulty" for a partial credit item is the point at which top and bottom categories are equally probable. The bottom category of a long scale tends to be relatively rarely and idiosyncratically used. So, for equating purposes, it may be more robust to define the item difficulty to the be point at which the two most frequent categories (across the two tests) are equally probable. This provides a more stable, and statistically more secure, "item difficulty" for the polytomous item.
If your software does not report one overall partial-credit item difficulty in each analysis, but instead a set of threshold difficulties, then average the threshold difficulties for an overall difficulty.
A. The examination board may assume that the one 4-point partial credit item is equivalent to 4 dichotomous items. If so the equating constant between the two tests is:
((Sum of MCQ common-item difficulty differences) + 4*(partial credit difficulty difference)) / (20 + 4)
B. The examination board may want the one 4-point partial credit item to have the same influence as all 20 dichotomous items. If so the equating constant is:
((Sum of MCQ common-item difficulty differences) + 20*(partial credit difficulty difference)) / (20 + 20)
C. An option beloved of statisticians is "information-weighting" (i.e., weighting by the inverse of the item-difficulty-standard-error-squared). This will give the 4-point partial credit item about 6 times the influence of a 1-point dichotomous item.
D. Inverse-standard-error weighting ("effect-size" weighting) of the items is more consistent when combining subtests, see RMT 8:3, p. 376. This will give the 4-point partial credit item about 2.5 times the influence of a 1-point dichotomous item.
In this example, to specify that for 1 partial-credit item = 4 dichotomous items would also be to opt for a compromise between the two statistical viewpoints.
Equating constants with mixed item types, Rasch Measurement Transactions, 2004, 18:3 p. 992
|Rasch Measurement Transactions (free, online)||Rasch Measurement research papers (free, online)||Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch||Applying the Rasch Model 3rd. Ed., Bond & Fox||Best Test Design, Wright & Stone|
|Rating Scale Analysis, Wright & Masters||Introduction to Rasch Measurement, E. Smith & R. Smith||Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement, Thomas Eckes||Invariant Measurement: Using Rasch Models in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, George Engelhard, Jr.||Statistical Analyses for Language Testers, Rita Green|
|Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar||Journal of Applied Measurement||Rasch models for measurement, David Andrich||Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson||Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, Boone, Stave, Yale|
|in Spanish:||Análisis de Rasch para todos, Agustín Tristán||Mediciones, Posicionamientos y Diagnósticos Competitivos, Juan Ramón Oreja Rodríguez|
|Forum||Rasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic|
Go to Top of Page
Go to index of all Rasch Measurement Transactions
AERA members: Join the Rasch Measurement SIG and receive the printed version of RMT
Some back issues of RMT are available as bound volumes
Subscribe to Journal of Applied Measurement
Go to Institute for Objective Measurement Home Page. The Rasch Measurement SIG (AERA) thanks the Institute for Objective Measurement for inviting the publication of Rasch Measurement Transactions on the Institute's website, www.rasch.org.
|Coming Rasch-related Events|
|Jan. 30-31, 2020, Thu.-Fri.||A Course on Rasch Measurement Theory - Part 1, Sydney, Australia, course flyer|
|Feb. 3-7, 2020, Mon.-Fri.||A Course on Rasch Measurement Theory - Part 2, Sydney, Australia, course flyer|
|Jan. 24 - Feb. 21, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|Apr. 14-17, 2020, Tue.-Fri.||International Objective Measurement Workshop (IOMW), University of California, Berkeley, https://www.iomw.org/|
|May 22 - June 19, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 26 - July 24, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 29 - July 1, 2020, Mon.-Wed.||Measurement at the Crossroads 2020, Milan, Italy , https://convegni.unicatt.it/mac-home|
|July 1 - July 3, 2020, Wed.-Fri.||International Measurement Confederation (IMEKO) Joint Symposium, Warsaw, Poland, http://www.imeko-warsaw-2020.org/|
|Aug. 7 - Sept. 4, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com|
|Oct. 9 - Nov. 6, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 25 - July 23, 2021, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
The URL of this page is www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt183o.htm