Question: I was taught that all raw scores on a test have the same raw score standard error, SEM, and this is:
SEM = raw score S.D. * sqrt (1-Reliability).
Why do standard errors for person measures differ?
Answer: The raw score "test" reliability (Cronbach Alpha, KR-20, etc.) is based on an average standard error of the raw scores for the sample. Each different raw score on the same set of items has a different standard error. The raw score standard errors are biggest at the center of the test and smallest (zero) at the extreme maximum and minimum scores. Using Bernoulli theory, CTT could compute a standard error for each different raw score, but no one bothers. In contrast, the standard error of a Rasch measure is smallest in the center of the test and biggest at the extremes. Zero and perfect raw scores have raw score standard errors of zero, but the corresponding Rasch measures have infinite standard errors. Since infinity is an impractical number, infinity is usually replaced by the standard error for a conceptual raw score slightly more central by 0.3 score-points, or so, than the maximum or minimum possible raw score.
The plot showns the relationship between the raw score S.E. and the Rasch measure S.E. for a 30 item dichotomous test. The shape of the raw-score S.E. curve can be confirmed by computing the square-root of the binomial variance of each raw score, assuming that the 30 items are equally difficult:
S.E. of measurement of raw score n, corresponding to person ability estimate θ, where L is the number of equally difficult dichotomous items in the test.
(If the item difficulties vary, then the following logic is the same, but the arithmetic is a little more difficult.)
Probability of success on one equally-difficult item, P = n/L
Binomial variance of response to 1 item = P*(1-P)
Binomial variance of L items = L*P*(1-P) = Test information at score n or ability θ
Classical Test Theory (CTT) SEM for raw score n = √( L*P*(1-P) ) = √( n * (L-n) / L)
Rasch measure SEM for ability estimate θ corresponding to raw score n = 1 / √( L*P*(1-P) ) = 1 / √( n * (L-n) / L)
Notice that SEM(Raw Score n) ≈ 1 / ( SEM(Rasch Measure θ in logits) )
SEM(Rasch Measure θ in logits) ≈ 1 / ( SEM(Raw Score n) )
Classical Test Theory (CTT) computes a "test" reliability = R. From this, an average
SEM (standard error of measurement) of the raw scores can be estimated:
Average raw-score SEM = √(1-R) * (observed raw score S.D.).
Rasch computes an S.E. = SEM for each measure. But, like the raw score reliability, the Rasch reliability is also based on the average of the standard errors of the sample ability estimates, θs.
Standard Errors and Reliabilities: Rasch and Raw Score, Rasch Measurement Transactions, 2007, 20:4 p. 1086
|Rasch Measurement Transactions (free, online)||Rasch Measurement research papers (free, online)||Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch||Applying the Rasch Model 3rd. Ed., Bond & Fox||Best Test Design, Wright & Stone|
|Rating Scale Analysis, Wright & Masters||Introduction to Rasch Measurement, E. Smith & R. Smith||Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement, Thomas Eckes||Invariant Measurement: Using Rasch Models in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, George Engelhard, Jr.||Statistical Analyses for Language Testers, Rita Green|
|Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar||Journal of Applied Measurement||Rasch models for measurement, David Andrich||Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson||Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, Boone, Stave, Yale|
|in Spanish:||Análisis de Rasch para todos, Agustín Tristán||Mediciones, Posicionamientos y Diagnósticos Competitivos, Juan Ramón Oreja Rodríguez|
|Forum||Rasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic|
Go to Top of Page
Go to index of all Rasch Measurement Transactions
AERA members: Join the Rasch Measurement SIG and receive the printed version of RMT
Some back issues of RMT are available as bound volumes
Subscribe to Journal of Applied Measurement
Go to Institute for Objective Measurement Home Page. The Rasch Measurement SIG (AERA) thanks the Institute for Objective Measurement for inviting the publication of Rasch Measurement Transactions on the Institute's website, www.rasch.org.
|Coming Rasch-related Events|
|Jan. 30-31, 2020, Thu.-Fri.||A Course on Rasch Measurement Theory - Part 1, Sydney, Australia, course flyer|
|Feb. 3-7, 2020, Mon.-Fri.||A Course on Rasch Measurement Theory - Part 2, Sydney, Australia, course flyer|
|Jan. 24 - Feb. 21, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|Apr. 14-17, 2020, Tue.-Fri.||International Objective Measurement Workshop (IOMW), University of California, Berkeley, https://www.iomw.org/|
|May 22 - June 19, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 26 - July 24, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 29 - July 1, 2020, Mon.-Wed.||Measurement at the Crossroads 2020, Milan, Italy , https://convegni.unicatt.it/mac-home|
|July 1 - July 3, 2020, Wed.-Fri.||International Measurement Confederation (IMEKO) Joint Symposium, Warsaw, Poland, http://www.imeko-warsaw-2020.org/|
|Aug. 7 - Sept. 4, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com|
|Oct. 9 - Nov. 6, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 25 - July 23, 2021, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
The URL of this page is www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt204f.htm