Kingsbury's (2003) study of the long term stability of item parameter estimates in achievement testing has a number of important features.
First, rather than using parameter estimates from a set of items used in a single test, it investigated the stability of item parameter estimates in two large item banks used by the Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) to measure achievement in mathematics (> 2300 items) and reading (c.1400 items) with students from school years 2-10 in seven US states. Sample sizes for the 1999-2000 school year item calibrations ranged from 300 to 10,000 students.
Second, the elapsed time since initial calibration ranged from 7 to 22 years.
Third, and most importantly (for these purposes), "the one-parameter logistic (1PL) IRT model (Wright, 1977) was used to create and maintain the underlying measurement scales used with these banks." While thousands of items have been added to these item banks over the course of time, each item has been connected to the original measurement scale through the use of IRT procedures and systematic Rasch measurement practices (Ingebo, 1997).
The observed correlations between the original and new item difficulties were extremely high (.967 in mathematics, .976 in reading), more like what would be expected if items were given to two samples at the same time, rather than samples separated by a time span from 7 to 20 years. Over that period, the average drift in the item difficulty parameters was .01 standard deviations of the mean item difficulty estimate. In Rasch measurement terms (i.e., focusing on impact on the measurement scales), the largest observed change in student scores moving from the original calibrations to the new calibrations was at the level of the minimal possible difference detectable by the tests, with over 99% of expected changes being less than the minimal detectable difference (Kingsbury, 2003).
NWEA have demonstrated measure-invariance beyond anything achieved anywhere else in the human sciences.
Trevor Bond
Hong Kong Institute of Education
Ingebo, G. S. (1997). Probability in the measure of achievement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
Kingsbury, G. (2003, April). A long-term study of the stability of item parameter estimates. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Wright, B.D. (1977). Solving Measurement Problems with the Rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14(2), 97-116.
Invariance and Item Stability. Bond, T. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 2008, 22:1 p. 1159
Forum | Rasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic |
Go to Top of Page
Go to index of all Rasch Measurement Transactions
AERA members: Join the Rasch Measurement SIG and receive the printed version of RMT
Some back issues of RMT are available as bound volumes
Subscribe to Journal of Applied Measurement
Go to Institute for Objective Measurement Home Page. The Rasch Measurement SIG (AERA) thanks the Institute for Objective Measurement for inviting the publication of Rasch Measurement Transactions on the Institute's website, www.rasch.org.
Coming Rasch-related Events | |
---|---|
Oct. 4 - Nov. 8, 2024, Fri.-Fri. | On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com |
Jan. 17 - Feb. 21, 2025, Fri.-Fri. | On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com |
May 16 - June 20, 2025, Fri.-Fri. | On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com |
June 20 - July 18, 2025, Fri.-Fri. | On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com |
Oct. 3 - Nov. 7, 2025, Fri.-Fri. | On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com |
The URL of this page is www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt221h.htm
Website: www.rasch.org/rmt/contents.htm