Foundations of Inference

There are four obstacles to inference which science must overcome.

have => want
now => later
statistic => parameter
regular irregularity
misfit detection
Bernoulli 1713
De Moivre 1733
Laplace 1774
Poisson 1837
unequal intervals
Luce/Tukey 1964
Fechner 1860
Helmholtz 1887
N.Campbell 1920
conjoint order
Rasch 1960
R.A.Fisher 1920
Thurstone 1925
Guttman 1944
arbitrary grouping
ambiguous hierarchy
Kolmogorov 1932
Levy 1924
Bookstein 1992
de Finetti 1931

1. Uncertainty is the motivation for inference. We have only the past with which to foresee the future. The past may seem certain. But, on reflection, it is realized to have been not only unique and unrepeatable - awash in special circumstances and inexplicable outcomes - but also a mere interpretation. In order to generalize the problematic past, we invent probability distributions that describe how idiosyncratic data can result from regular processes. It is probability that enables us to make the past useful for predicting the future.

2. Distortion occurs during the transition from observation to conceptualization. Data have no meaning of their own, they must always be interpreted. This interpretation is expedited when we transform our data in ways that facilitate thinking. Our ability to figure things out is rooted in our ability to visualize. Our ability to visualize devolved from the survival value of bodily navigation. Thus, the best solution to distortion is to represent observations in a linear, i.e., additive, form that makes our observations look like the space in front of us. To "see" what our data "mean", we "picture" them.

3. Confusion is caused by the inevitability of inter-action and interdependency. Raw data are too complicated to understand. Each data point indicates many things, intended and unintended. As we look for tomorrow's probabilities in yesterday's lessons, confounding confuses us. Our solution is to force the endless complexity we experience into only a few invented "dimensions", few enough that we can think clearly with them. The authority of these fictions is their logic and utility. Their "truth" is intangible. What matters is whether they work - a consequence discoverable in future experience.

The logic necessary to control confounding is enforced singularity. Define and measure one dimension at a time. The mathematics necessary is parameter separability. Only models which introduce hypothesized "causes" as separately estimable parameters survive confounding. The models which do this are the founding laws of quantitative research. They define measurement. They determine what is measurable. They decide which data are useful.

4. Ambiguity, a different form of confusion, is also present, because we never know precisely what to count or at what level of detail. To measure traffic, do we count cars or passengers? Do we rate performance holistically or itemize? Robust inference requires that incidental changes in data collection cause no change in inference. Ambiguity is controlled by measurement models that possess divisibility and thus are stable with respect to arbitrary composition. Divisibility, the solution to ambiguity, is algebraically equivalent to separability, the solution to confusion.

The Table summarizes the obstacles to inference, their current solutions and the originators of these solutions.

Benjamin D. Wright 1994 RMT 8:1 p. 346

Foundations of inference. Wright BD. … Rasch Measurement Transactions, 1994, 8:1 p.346

Rasch Publications
Rasch Measurement Transactions (free, online) Rasch Measurement research papers (free, online) Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch Applying the Rasch Model 3rd. Ed., Bond & Fox Best Test Design, Wright & Stone
Rating Scale Analysis, Wright & Masters Introduction to Rasch Measurement, E. Smith & R. Smith Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement, Thomas Eckes Invariant Measurement: Using Rasch Models in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, George Engelhard, Jr. Statistical Analyses for Language Testers, Rita Green
Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar Journal of Applied Measurement Rasch models for measurement, David Andrich Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, Boone, Stave, Yale
in Spanish: Análisis de Rasch para todos, Agustín Tristán Mediciones, Posicionamientos y Diagnósticos Competitivos, Juan Ramón Oreja Rodríguez

To be emailed about new material on
please enter your email address here:

I want to Subscribe: & click below
I want to Unsubscribe: & click below

Please set your SPAM filter to accept emails from welcomes your comments:

Your email address (if you want us to reply):


ForumRasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic

Go to Top of Page
Go to index of all Rasch Measurement Transactions
AERA members: Join the Rasch Measurement SIG and receive the printed version of RMT
Some back issues of RMT are available as bound volumes
Subscribe to Journal of Applied Measurement

Go to Institute for Objective Measurement Home Page. The Rasch Measurement SIG (AERA) thanks the Institute for Objective Measurement for inviting the publication of Rasch Measurement Transactions on the Institute's website,

Coming Rasch-related Events
Aug. 11 - Sept. 8, 2023, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets),
Aug. 29 - 30, 2023, Tue.-Wed. Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Society (PROMS), World Sports University, Macau, SAR, China
Oct. 6 - Nov. 3, 2023, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Facets),
June 12 - 14, 2024, Wed.-Fri. 1st Scandinavian Applied Measurement Conference, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden


The URL of this page is