Clients vs. therapists. Gerardi S, Eckberg S. 1995, 8:4 p.399
A common opinion in medical rehabilitation is that patients feel more disabled than their therapists perceive them to be. Successful therapy requires the therapist to act as though the patient can almost "do it" - that success is almost within reach. Patients, however, in their need for help and sympathy, often act as though they are in a worse state than they appear to be.
Support, clarity and hope are provided by the Occupational Rehabilitation Database (ORDB) collected in a 1994 study funded by the American Occupational Therapy Foundation. 230 clients from 28 rehabilitation sites across the USA rated themselves at rehabilitation admission and discharge. They were also rated by their therapists. The plot compares the item calibrations.
There were 8 physical movement items on the protocol. Clients rated themselves lower than their therapists did. Clients saw themselves as less effective than their therapists did. Overall, clients reported the items to be .75 logits more challenging than did their therapists. Thus clients were functioning .75 logits less capably in their own minds than in the reports of their therapists. This supports and quantifies the anecdotal evidence.
The plot also reaches beyond the common wisdom. The plot shows a trend. The less incapacitated the client, the smaller the discrepancy between client and therapist views. As clients heal, they see themselves performing better. Then the items becoming suitable for them (the harder items: carrying, lifting..) are reported ever closer to the way their therapists see them. Extrapolating onwards, we reach a point, corresponding to normal functioning, at which clients and therapists agree. To confirm this extrapolation, more demanding items could be devised and administered to suitably capable clients.
The hope lives in the trend-line. Now we can transform measures based on patient self-ratings and therapist-based measures onto the same scale of reference. This simplifies the clinical task of assessment, and opens the door to tracking patient progress, even over the telephone.
Clients vs. therapists. Gerardi S, Eckberg S. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 1995, 8:4 p.399
|Rasch Measurement Transactions (free, online)||Rasch Measurement research papers (free, online)||Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch||Applying the Rasch Model 3rd. Ed., Bond & Fox||Best Test Design, Wright & Stone|
|Rating Scale Analysis, Wright & Masters||Introduction to Rasch Measurement, E. Smith & R. Smith||Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement, Thomas Eckes||Invariant Measurement: Using Rasch Models in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, George Engelhard, Jr.||Statistical Analyses for Language Testers, Rita Green|
|Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar||Journal of Applied Measurement||Rasch models for measurement, David Andrich||Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson||Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, Boone, Stave, Yale|
|in Spanish:||Análisis de Rasch para todos, Agustín Tristán||Mediciones, Posicionamientos y Diagnósticos Competitivos, Juan Ramón Oreja Rodríguez|
|Forum||Rasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic|
Go to Top of Page
Go to index of all Rasch Measurement Transactions
AERA members: Join the Rasch Measurement SIG and receive the printed version of RMT
Some back issues of RMT are available as bound volumes
Subscribe to Journal of Applied Measurement
Go to Institute for Objective Measurement Home Page. The Rasch Measurement SIG (AERA) thanks the Institute for Objective Measurement for inviting the publication of Rasch Measurement Transactions on the Institute's website, www.rasch.org.
|Coming Rasch-related Events|
|Jan. 30-31, 2020, Thu.-Fri.||A Course on Rasch Measurement Theory - Part 1, Sydney, Australia, course flyer|
|Feb. 3-7, 2020, Mon.-Fri.||A Course on Rasch Measurement Theory - Part 2, Sydney, Australia, course flyer|
|Jan. 24 - Feb. 21, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|Apr. 14-17, 2020, Tue.-Fri.||International Objective Measurement Workshop (IOMW), University of California, Berkeley, https://www.iomw.org/|
|May 22 - June 19, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 26 - July 24, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 29 - July 1, 2020, Mon.-Wed.||Measurement at the Crossroads 2020, Milan, Italy , https://convegni.unicatt.it/mac-home|
|July 1 - July 3, 2020, Wed.-Fri.||International Measurement Confederation (IMEKO) Joint Symposium, Warsaw, Poland, http://www.imeko-warsaw-2020.org/|
|Aug. 7 - Sept. 4, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com|
|Oct. 9 - Nov. 6, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 25 - July 23, 2021, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
The URL of this page is www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt84j.htm