Richardson and Stalnaker (1933) derived rpbis, the point-biserial correlation between an ordinal scale with only two values and a continuous, interval scale, based on the biserial correlation of Karl Pearson (1909). Nowadays, rpbis is often the "corrected" correlation between respondents' right/wrong responses to a target item and their ordinal raw scores on the test (without the target item) (Henrysson). rpbis indicates the extent to which an item cooperates with the rest of the test. It is useful in Rasch analysis because negative values detect miskeyed MCQ responses and negatively worded survey questions. Other diagnostic use, such as detecting redundancy by means of overly high positive values, is problematic because of deficiencies in rpbis.
An obvious improvement in rpbis would be to replace ordinal raw scores by interval ability measures. This produces the point- bimeasure correlation, rpbim:
M1 is the mean measure of the n1 respondents answering the item correctly
M0 is the mean measure of the n0 respondents answering the item incorrectly
SDM is the standard deviation of all n1+n0=n respondent measures.
Even rpbim, however, is sensitive to targeting. With a uniform distribution of person abilities, the maximum rpbim could be .71 for an item with p-value .95, but .87 for an item with p-value .50. The corresponding minimum values could be -0.71 and -0.87. But ranges need not be symmetrical about 0. Fortunately rpbim's sensitivity to targeting can be reduced by standardizing its range to -1.0 to 1.0.
The maximum rpbim attainable for any item p-value is the one produced by its Guttman pattern (all 1's by high ability respondents, all 0's by low). The minimum rpbim is the anti- Guttman pattern (all 0's by high ability respondents, all 1's by low). This provides a standardized rpbig ("g" for Guttman):
Negative values continue to indicate that this item is "working backwards", contradicting the construct. But values close to 1.0 are now diagnostic. They indicate a local lack of stochasticity in the data.
Note: the biserial correlation originated in Karl Pearson, '"On a New Method of Determining Correlation ....", Biometrika, Vol. VII, pp. 96-105, 1909, and the point-biserial correlation originated in Richardson, M.W. & Stalnaker, J.M. (1933). "A note on the use of bi-serial r in test research". Journal of General Psychology, 8, 463-465.
Henrysson, S. (1963). Correction for item-total correlations in item analysis. Psychometrika, 28, 211-218.
Point-biserial fit indices. Stenner AJ. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 1995, 9:1 p.416
|Rasch Measurement Transactions (free, online)||Rasch Measurement research papers (free, online)||Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch||Applying the Rasch Model 3rd. Ed., Bond & Fox||Best Test Design, Wright & Stone|
|Rating Scale Analysis, Wright & Masters||Introduction to Rasch Measurement, E. Smith & R. Smith||Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement, Thomas Eckes||Invariant Measurement: Using Rasch Models in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, George Engelhard, Jr.||Statistical Analyses for Language Testers, Rita Green|
|Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar||Journal of Applied Measurement||Rasch models for measurement, David Andrich||Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson||Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, Boone, Stave, Yale|
|in Spanish:||Análisis de Rasch para todos, Agustín Tristán||Mediciones, Posicionamientos y Diagnósticos Competitivos, Juan Ramón Oreja Rodríguez|
|Forum||Rasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic|
Go to Top of Page
Go to index of all Rasch Measurement Transactions
AERA members: Join the Rasch Measurement SIG and receive the printed version of RMT
Some back issues of RMT are available as bound volumes
Subscribe to Journal of Applied Measurement
Go to Institute for Objective Measurement Home Page. The Rasch Measurement SIG (AERA) thanks the Institute for Objective Measurement for inviting the publication of Rasch Measurement Transactions on the Institute's website, www.rasch.org.
|Coming Rasch-related Events|
|Jan. 30-31, 2020, Thu.-Fri.||A Course on Rasch Measurement Theory - Part 1, Sydney, Australia, course flyer|
|Feb. 3-7, 2020, Mon.-Fri.||A Course on Rasch Measurement Theory - Part 2, Sydney, Australia, course flyer|
|Jan. 24 - Feb. 21, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|Apr. 14-17, 2020, Tue.-Fri.||International Objective Measurement Workshop (IOMW), University of California, Berkeley, https://www.iomw.org/|
|May 22 - June 19, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 26 - July 24, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 29 - July 1, 2020, Mon.-Wed.||Measurement at the Crossroads 2020, Milan, Italy , https://convegni.unicatt.it/mac-home|
|July 1 - July 3, 2020, Wed.-Fri.||International Measurement Confederation (IMEKO) Joint Symposium, Warsaw, Poland, http://www.imeko-warsaw-2020.org/|
|Aug. 7 - Sept. 4, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com|
|Oct. 9 - Nov. 6, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 25 - July 23, 2021, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
The URL of this page is www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt91h.htm