Rasch Regression for the Older Driver Data
0 : 1 : 2 : 3 : 4 CLOCK
0 : 3: 4: 8 : 9:10:11 12 13: 14: 15 : 16 VISUAL
incapable 0 : 1 capable DRIVING DIAGNOSIS
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
X X X X X X X X X X X CAPABLE DRIVERS
X X X X X X X X
X X X X
X X X
S M S
X X X X X X X INCAPABLE DRIVERS
X X X X X X X
X X X X X
S M S
The conventional way to assess the driving ability of older drivers is to administer a standard driving test. Less expensive diagnostic alternatives are being sought as replacements. A representative sample of 49 elderly drivers, referred for a driving diagnosis and possible license renewal, was given two paper-and-pencil tests of cognitive functioning: the Motor-Free Visual Perceptual Test (VISUAL) and the Clock Drawing Task (CLOCK). Both instruments have been used as "screening tool[s] in identifying those who are unfit to undergo an on-road evaluation" (Korner-Bitensky et al., p. 253). The data were analyzed with Wright's Rasch regression model. The VISUAL and CLOCK variables were co-calibrated and anchored to define a two-test unidimensional, reproducible, and stable yardstick. The Driving Diagnosis was then added as a dichotomous item.
The KEYMAP illustrates that a person with the score of 11 and higher on the VISUAL test or the score of 3 and 4 on the CLOCK test would have a high probability of being diagnosed as capable of driving. Here we find 18 patients diagnosed as capable drivers and 9 patients diagnosed as incapable drivers. Similarly, people with score of 10 and below on the VISUAL test or the score of 1 and 2 on the CLOCK test would have a high probability of being diagnosed as incapable of driving. Here we find 10 patients diagnosed as capable drivers and 12 patients diagnosed as incapable drivers.
The persons, however, are mainly clustered in the area between 0 and 1 on the Driving Diagnosis, that is, within approximately 1 logit of the half-score point. This lends itself to the conclusion that more than two thirds of the participants could not be diagnosed with greater than 75% accuracy.
The map also shows that the predictive potential of the two tests is different. For the CLOCK test, even the highest score of 4 does not predict a person's driving capability with 90% accuracy. Therefore, this test may not be a reliable screening tool for identifying capable drivers. For the VISUAL test, the ruler is longer, but almost all the drivers cluster in the middle. A person needs to score between 0 and 4 to be accurately diagnosed as cognitively incapable, or to score between 14 and 16 to be accurately diagnosed as capable.
Svetlana Beltyukova, Dan Cipriani, Song Yan, Tina Ughrin & Christine Fox, The University of Toledo
Korner-Bitensky, N. A., et al. (2000). Visual testing for readiness to drive after stroke: A multicenter study. [VISUAL]. Medical Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 253-259.
Shulman, K. I. (2000). Clock-drawing: Is it the ideal cognitive screening test? [CLOCK]. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Rasch Regression Predicts Driving Capability. Beltyukova S., Cipriani D., Yan S., Ughrin T., Fox C. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 2001, 15:1 p.789-790
|Rasch Measurement Transactions (free, online)||Rasch Measurement research papers (free, online)||Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch||Applying the Rasch Model 3rd. Ed., Bond & Fox||Best Test Design, Wright & Stone|
|Rating Scale Analysis, Wright & Masters||Introduction to Rasch Measurement, E. Smith & R. Smith||Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement, Thomas Eckes||Invariant Measurement: Using Rasch Models in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, George Engelhard, Jr.||Statistical Analyses for Language Testers, Rita Green|
|Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar||Journal of Applied Measurement||Rasch models for measurement, David Andrich||Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson||Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, Boone, Stave, Yale|
|in Spanish:||Análisis de Rasch para todos, Agustín Tristán||Mediciones, Posicionamientos y Diagnósticos Competitivos, Juan Ramón Oreja Rodríguez|
|Forum||Rasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic|
Go to Top of Page
Go to index of all Rasch Measurement Transactions
AERA members: Join the Rasch Measurement SIG and receive the printed version of RMT
Some back issues of RMT are available as bound volumes
Subscribe to Journal of Applied Measurement
Go to Institute for Objective Measurement Home Page. The Rasch Measurement SIG (AERA) thanks the Institute for Objective Measurement for inviting the publication of Rasch Measurement Transactions on the Institute's website, www.rasch.org.
|Coming Rasch-related Events|
|Apr. 14-17, 2020, Tue.-Fri.||International Objective Measurement Workshop (IOMW), University of California, Berkeley, https://www.iomw.org/|
|May 22 - June 19, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 26 - July 24, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 29 - July 1, 2020, Mon.-Wed.||Measurement at the Crossroads 2020, Milan, Italy , https://convegni.unicatt.it/mac-home|
|July - November, 2020||On-line course: An Introduction to Rasch Measurement Theory and RUMM2030Plus (Andrich & Marais), http://www.education.uwa.edu.au/ppl/courses|
|July 1 - July 3, 2020, Wed.-Fri.||International Measurement Confederation (IMEKO) Joint Symposium, Warsaw, Poland, http://www.imeko-warsaw-2020.org/|
|Aug. 7 - Sept. 4, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com|
|Oct. 9 - Nov. 6, 2020, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
|June 25 - July 23, 2021, Fri.-Fri.||On-line workshop: Practical Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com|
The URL of this page is www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt151b.htm